AI & LLM

AI & LLM Penetration Testing

Security testing for LLM-powered features — prompt injection, data leakage, and model abuse, aligned to the OWASP LLM Top 10.

Overview

AI and LLM penetration testing secures LLM-powered features against prompt injection, data leakage, and model abuse — aligned to the OWASP LLM Top 10, with QA-reviewed, evidence-backed findings.

Product and security teams assessing applications that integrate language models, retrieval or agent workflows.

What to bring to scoping

  • ✓Define application, model/tool and data boundaries.
  • ✓Provide test roles and representative use cases, with restrictions on data and external actions.
What we test

Where attackers get in — and where we look.

Direct & indirect prompt injection

Sensitive-data leakage

Insecure output handling & XSS

Training-data & RAG exposure

Excessive agency & guardrail bypass

Model, plugin & supply-chain abuse

How we test

An evidence-driven methodology.

Scope & recon

We agree objectives and rules of engagement, then map what you actually expose.

Map the attack surface

Enumerate entry points, roles, and trust boundaries a real attacker would target.

Manual exploitation

Certified testers exploit flaws by hand — chaining issues scanners never connect.

Prove impact

Findings ship with supporting evidence and business context.

Report & retest

Risk-ranked reporting with remediation guidance; retests under agreed terms.

What you get

Evidence you can act on.

Assessment of the agreed AI application workflows.

Evidence-backed observations and remediation guidance.

Reporting tied to the authorized scope and limitations.

How to engage

This is a human-delivered security-testing service, not a promise of an autonomous AI-testing product.

Discuss this scope
Related programs

Make it a program.

Pair this test with a program that extends testing between engagements.

FAQ

AI & LLM Penetration Testing — questions buyers ask.

What is prompt injection?

Prompt injection manipulates an LLM’s instructions — directly or through poisoned content it reads (indirect) — to make it leak data or take unintended actions. It is the top LLM risk we test.

Do you follow the OWASP LLM Top 10?

Yes — our testing maps to the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications, covering injection, data leakage, insecure output handling, and excessive agency.

Can you test RAG systems?

Yes — retrieval-augmented generation introduces training-data and context-exposure risks that we specifically target.

Prove what an attacker could actually do.

A short scoping call, no obligation.